Feature grids in this category tend to blur what ships with what is planned. Everything below carries a status, and "in development" means exactly that — not "ask your rep".
Your engineers did not standardise on one agent and they are not going to. ClawMetry treats the runtime as a detail: the same cost, activity, and policy surface works across all of them.
Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini CLI, Cline, OpenHands, Aider, Goose, OpenCode, Devin, Antigravity, Kimi, Grok, Qwen Code, DeepSeek Harness and more.
OpenClaw, NVIDIA NemoClaw, Hermes, DeepAgents, n8n, Exo, Pi, and self-hosted harnesses. New runtimes are added on request as part of an enterprise engagement.
Off unless you turn it on. A tool that silently changes how your agents behave is not something a platform team can safely deploy.
Enforcement depth varies by runtime. Some agents expose a pre-tool hook we can gate on; others only expose telemetry after the fact, so for those we can observe and alert but not block. We will tell you exactly which of your runtimes fall into which category before you buy — ask for the conformance matrix.
This is the section most vendors would blur. Two of these rows are the reason some deals should wait a quarter, and you should know that before the first call rather than after the pilot.
An overclaim discovered during your security review does not cost us a feature request, it costs us the deal and costs you a quarter. We would rather lose the ones we are not ready for and keep the ones we are.
The security whitepaper covers architecture and data flows. The procurement pack covers everything a vendor-review process asks for.